bdnews24.com blog

LGBT community calls for the repeal of Section 377

Rainer Ebert | 22 November 2011 5:06 pm

Gay couple in Dhaka

Sam is a university-educated guy of 25 years. He is living in Dhaka and works as a university teacher. Six years ago, after graduating from college at the age of 19, he discovered that his sexual orientation deviates from the cultural norm in Bangladesh. Today he is in a romantic relationship with a man. He also has had sexual encounters with women before and describes himself as a bisexual man. Sam and his boyfriend go on trips together, hold hands on the streets of Dhaka and share a bed when staying at each other’s places. Since male-male friendships are traditionally very intimate in Bangladesh, these practices cast no doubt upon their presumed heterosexual identities. Family and friends consider Sam and his boyfriend to be close friends. “As long as you don’t come out open to your family, you are safe,” Sam explains. Sam is not his real name. Afraid of the possible social and legal consequences, he agreed to speak only under the condition of anonymity.

Like Sam and his boyfriend, many homosexuals in Bangladesh hide their sexual orientation from their friends and families. “It is easy to live a moderate life with a hidden identity if one is homosexual.” In predominantly Muslim countries, homosexuality is often looked upon as a sin. Accordingly, the consequences of coming out can be severe. Some gay men who inform their families about their sexual orientation are forced into a heterosexual marriage. Other parents consider homosexuality a mental illness and object their gay sons to religious brainwashing or psychiatric treatment. Sam heard of cases in Bangladesh where electric shocks were applied to homosexual men in an effort to “cure” them from their supposed psychiatric condition. He is convinced that, “unless the government, parents and friends understand that a man or woman can be a gay or a lesbian and yet be a very good and devout Muslim, Hindu or Christian, the chances for LGBT (‘lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender’) rights in Bangladesh are low.” Society in Bangladesh is far from that. Homosexuality among men is seen as a morally deprived Western phenomenon that needs to be fended off. “While the existence of gay sex is at least acknowledged by most people though, lesbian sex does not even exist in the dreams of people in Bangladesh.”

The status of homosexuality as a social and religious taboo is also reflected in the Bangladeshi Criminal Code. Its Section 377, a legacy of British rule, refers to consensual oral and anal sex as “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” and subjects it to punishment up to imprisonment for life. Effectively, this section makes homosexual intercourse illegal in Bangladesh. Interestingly, prosecutions under Section 377 are extremely rare. Section 377, hence, does not impair Bangladesh’s moderate image in the world and questions about the country’s human rights record on the issue of homosexuality are avoided in the international arena. Not only in court, but also in mainstream media the issue has largely been ignored. The LGBT community is forced into a shadow existence and its voice is effectively silenced in the public sphere. However, mainly due to new media, times are changing.

Starting out as an online group in 2002, an organization called Boys of Bangladesh (BoB) has become a central forum for gay and bisexual men in Bangladesh. BoB currently has more than 2000 registered members, including school students as well as Ph.D. holders. Their ages range between 16 and more than 50 years. BoB is run by around twenty young men and has increasingly become public in recent years. In November 2010, it conducted the second edition of a festival titled “Under the Rainbow”, in cooperation with the German Goethe-Institut in Dhaka. Under the slogan “accept diversity and end discrimination”, the five-day festival included movie screenings, art exhibitions and musical performances and brought together leading human rights activists from with the country and abroad. Angela Grünert, director of the Goethe-Institut, explains her involvement in the LGBT movement in Bangladesh with the belief that “everyone should have equal rights in the society”, regardless of religion, ethnicity, sex or sexual orientation. BoB organized various other events, mainly in Dhaka, and its representatives attended international conferences on LGBT issues in Nepal and Thailand. The organization further provides homosexuals in Bangladesh with information on health and legal issues on its website at http://boysofbangladesh.org/.

Change on the subcontinent is also happening on the legal front. An Indian court in the country’s capital, Delhi, decriminalized homosexual intercourse by repealing Section 377 of the Indian Criminal Code in July 2009, saying that treating certain forms of consensual sex between adults as a crime is a violation of fundamental human rights. For Sam, this is a sign of hope. He is convinced that, due to the profound cultural links between India and Bangladesh, the Indian court’s ruling will spark a public debate on LGBT issues in Bangladesh and encourage the homosexual youth here to fight for their rights. “It is the youth, exposed to international media and increasingly educated, that is empowering the LGBT movement in Bangladesh.”

Some movements in Islam, such as the US-based Al-Fatiha Foundation, accept and consider homosexuality as natural and work towards the acceptance of non-heterosexual love-relationships within the global Muslim community. Progressive Muslim scholars around the world argue that Qur’anic verses on homosexuality are obsolete in the context of modern society and point out that, while the Qur’an speaks out against homosexual lust, it is silent on homosexual love. However, in Bangladesh, religion remains the single most persistent obstacle for LGBT rights.

The LGBT rights movement in Bangladesh is growing rapidly and the voices for the repeal of Section 377 are becoming louder. The issue is bound to emerge into a public battle over the young nation’s religious and cultural identity, human rights and modernity and will pose a challenge to policymakers, religious authorities and leaders of civil society alike.

————————————-
This article is written by Rainer Ebert and Mahmudul Hoque Moni.

Rainer Ebert is a moral philosopher at Rice University in the United States of America. He is specializing in animal ethics and issues of global justice. Rainer Ebert can be reached at rainer.ebert@rice.edu, http://www.rainerebert.com/.

Mahmudul Hoque Moni is the founding director of the Centre for Practical Multimedia Studies at the Department of Mass Communication and Journalism at the University of Dhaka. He is interested in human rights issues, social justice, sports media and visual communication and can be reached at mhmoni24@yahoo.com, http://www.mhmoni.weebly.com/.


23 Comments on “LGBT community calls for the repeal of Section 377” ;


24 November 2011 - 10:04 pm

I know one Akram who was bisexual. He looked womanish but enticed the boys to have sex with him. I think this kind of sex have a very negative impact on the boys who are abused. LGBT, I think, occur from baser instinct. So we must suppress it if we want to be refined and civilized. LGBT is sure to create disharmony in the men-women relationship leading to destruction of our civilization. LGBT are the very sins for which God destroyed people of Lot. So those who try to promote homosexuality are misguided and should be punished.

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

28 November 2011 - 7:22 am

Abuse is bad regardless of the sexual orientation of the abuser. Some heterosexual persons sexually abuse others just like some homosexual persons sexually abuse others. I hope you agree that this is a very poor argument for the immorality of both heterosexual and homosexual sex in general. Both heterosexual behavior and homosexual behavior are normal aspects of human sexuality. Homosexuality is no more a choice or a mental disorder than heterosexuality. Homosexual sex between consenting adults generally neither harms the two adults involved nor others. On the other hand, prejudice against homosexual and bisexual people, as apparent in your comment, can cause psychological harm and should not be tolerated. There is a bitter irony in the fact that you attempt to employ religion and a misguided understanding of what it means to be “civilized” to promote intolerance and discrimination. If you would like to learn more about the scientific facts concerning sexual orientation, please check http://www.apa.org/helpcenter/sexual-orientation.aspx


28 November 2011 - 8:57 pm

Homosexuality is a sickness in the same way necrophilia, incest and bestiality are. Homosexuals and homosexuality must be wiped out from the face of the earth. It is a perverted sexual practice and if 99% people become homosexuals — humanity will cease to exist — because natural selection do not promote it and it goes against even evolutionary reasoning behind human procreation and survival. It is also against our religion and people who go against our religion must not be pardoned.

Apart from all these reasons — it is unacceptable — same as mutual sex between an adult son and adult mother is unacceptable. Homosexuality law must not be repealed but changed to include death sentence by hanging, drawing and quartering, slow slicing or beheading in public of felons and criminals who not only involve themselves in such heinous acts but involved in propagating homosexual agendas in our beloved country.

  • Comments by Muhammad Bin Qasem

29 November 2011 - 12:08 am

Somerset Maugham in his ‘Cakes and Ale’ has shown through the character of Rosie that loose morals and goodness of heart can go hand-in-hand but nowadays I agree that most young men and women all over the world enjoy extramarital sexual relationship. But that does not mean that kind of gratification does not create any problem. The epidemics of AIDS and violence all over the world are the direct result of promiscuity and LGBT. Can you deny it? To solve this problem, I think we should reintroduce the contractual marriage which was permissible during the holy prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Only then can we mix cakes and ale with morality and legality.

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

29 November 2011 - 9:55 pm

Mr. Bin Qasem: If you had read my last post and the website I referred to, you would know that homosexuality is not a “sickness” but a normal aspect of human sexuality. To quote from the website of the American Psychological Association, “lesbian, gay, and bisexual orientations are not disorders. Research has found no inherent association between any of these sexual orientations and psychopathology.” Your comparison of homosexuality to necrophilia, incest and bestiality as well as your call for the murder of homosexual persons are deeply offensive and can not be tolerated in a free society. If you really loved your country as you claim to do, you would uphold the fundamental values of equality and religious freedom that are laid down in your constitution. It is not for the government to impose either your private views on morality nor some religious law on the free people of Bangladesh.

Mr. Subhan: There is no direct correlation between promiscuity and non-heterosexual intercourse as such on the one hand and AIDS and violence on the other hand. It is true that anal sex (as sometimes practiced between homosexual males) is generally more risky than vaginal intercourse but keep in mind that anal intercourse is also frequently practiced by many heterosexuals couples. Effective protective devices are available for anal, oral as well as vaginal sex. While the risk of infection can be reduced using these devices, some risk always remains. Adults freely choose to take that risk and it is not for the government to interfere with the free choices of competent citizens insofar no third party is harmed.


30 November 2011 - 12:26 am

Thank you for the article Rainer and for initiating a debate around sexuality, a taboo issue which is hardly ever discussed in our country.

I am a gay person and I think I know more than anyone else (who is not gay) what it feels to be one. The issue here is not about morality or religious scripture or society, to the core it’s absolutely about my RIGHT TO LIFE, which my constitution and my supreme Being guaranteed me. I don’t think Mr Sobhan or Mr Quasem (or the state or anyone else for that matter) has any say in deciding whether I should be allowed to live based on whom I love and how I love. Let my God decide it.

Unfortunately, the comments by the two gentlemen only show how foolishly ignorant we are and are not afraid to act on our limited knowledge. In fact, I am not really surprised since comparing homosexuality with necrophilia or bestiality or paedophilia are very common practices. But we don’t understand the very basic of homosexuality when we make such comments. Homosexuality happens simply between two consenting adults who find each other romantically arousing. The basic point is consent, which is absolutely absent in cases of necrophilia or bestiality. And the myth about homosexual spreading HIV/AIDS, Mr Rainer has already answered quite aptly.

Homosexuality is not a new product of the western civilization. It has been there since day one and a little study into ancient history will testify this. Now if we decide not to read and learn, that’s our problem, not homosexuals’. Homosexuality will remain a sin/crime/perversion as long as the society is homophobic. Change in attitude is all that is needed!

We might want to recall the days when Raja Ram Mohan was severely criticized for demanding a ban on Shati Daho Protha. There was also a time when women didn’t have voting rights. But we have come passed all those social stigmas, haven’t we? And a time will come when criminalization of homosexuality will also seem stupid!

It’s always a battle against the conservatives!

  • Comments by Himadri

30 November 2011 - 2:02 am

Mr. Rainer,
From your name it doesn’t sound like you are a Bangladeshi, but a westerner who is on a mission to propagate twisted ideas and practises in my country. So, I actually don’t care at all when you try to teach me how to love my country. I know very well how to do that and I will shed the last drop of blood in my body for the sake of the country if need be.

And let me tell you, homosexuality will never be accepted in my country. And there are millions of others (most likely 99.99% of the population) in this country who share similar view that I do. Ours is not one of those western nations where ‘perverts’ like homosexuals get legitimacy.

I also don’t give a damn to the pseudo-scientific interpretation of another Western association. If tomorrow APA says–“Being a mother-f…r is not a disorder. Research has found no inherent association between any of these sexual choice and psychopathology.”— you people are likely to accept it. But we won’t — it’s a matter of what we, Bangladeshis accept and acknowledge, not what is propagated by the western world. Homosexuality isn’t a sickness like that is studied by psychopathology and hence treated. It is a sickness that is close to perversions which constitutes crime against humanity, god and nature. Murderers are punished — they don’t deserve psychiatric treatment — though they are too mentally sick. Mental sickness doesn’t invite our sympathy.

Finally, I don’t think you have enough knowledge to interpret our constitution and the fundamental values of equality and religious freedom that are laid down in it.

  • Comments by Muhammad Bin Qasem

30 November 2011 - 9:15 am

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind –said Alber Einstein. True, in spite of all the religions prohibiting LGBT, people succumb to them, that is aberration not the regular saner practice. “Righteousness is good character. And sin is that which wavers in your soul and which you dislike the people finding out about.” said our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Now brother will you not be ashamed of having consenting sex with your sister and mother? God created us so only He knows better how we should live lives here. Hence, the need for religion. You have lost your tail; please don’t expect us to lose ours.

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

30 November 2011 - 7:05 pm

Agree 100% with brother Subhan. Furthermore, if the so-called basic point is consent — then is it ok for consenting mother and son having sex in public? Or, is it ok to kill, cook and eat a consenting person after having consenting homosexual sex – like what happened in some Western countries?

  • Comments by Muhammad Bin Qasem

1 December 2011 - 1:37 am

“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind” –said Albert Einstein.

Dear Abdus Subhan,
It will be nice to know the source of this quotation.

Other than pronouncing this famous four words; “God don’t play dice”, when venting his frustration over quantum spookiness, Einstein remained a hopelessly Godless man, despite attaining a status of demi-God in the realm of science.

Isaacson’s biography of Einstein can be a wonderful read.

  • Comments by Mohammad Zaman

1 December 2011 - 8:14 pm

Mr. Subhan: I do not expect you to give up your religious beliefs. I only expect you not to impose your personal beliefs on others. After all, “[t]here is no compulsion in religion.” (Qur’an 2:256) My article is primarily concerned with Section 377 and not with the question whether homosexuality is a sin according to Islam. Section 377 must be repealed since it is not for a government to enforce religious norms. Let Allah be the judge.


1 December 2011 - 11:08 pm

Brother, the world has seen much of your individualism and libertinism which is the seedbed of oppressive capitalism. So the government must be there to preserve national norms and religious values. The section 377 is just aimed at that and keeping shameless LGBT practitioners at bay. No more of your rotten stuff, the new trend now is justice and faith. Who has told you that ‘it is not for a government to enforce religious norms’?

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

3 December 2011 - 10:42 pm

Mr. Subhan: If you have any evidence that there is a correlation between non-heterosexual sex and “oppressive capitalism” or any other form of oppression, please share it with the readers of this blog. Also, please explain what makes you call LGBT people “shameless” and what they do “rotten”. There are many Bangladeshis who identify as queer. They are citizens just like you and should enjoy the same protection under the law, and what you say is offensive to them as well as to anybody who appreciates the fundamental human values of respect, tolerance and freedom. Religion should be about love, not hate, and is, in any case, a private matter. I believe that what competent adults do in their private sphere is neither any of your business, nor any of the government’s or any other group’s business. To quote the great moral philosopher John Stuart Mill, “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” Non-heterosexual sex harms others no more or less than heterosexual sex.


4 December 2011 - 7:59 am

Mr. Rainer Ebert, I thank you for putting up with this ‘queer’ guy for long. I showed the correlation between individualism which you are proponent of in your mission to establish LGBT and the oppressive capitalism in which a person can exploit the so-called individual freedom to exploit the teeming million for his own benefit. The world is now at one against this system as you see. Secondly, I wanted to say that if one has no shame he can do everything. It is shame that prevent many from doing all kinds of shameful acts that you are shamelessly advocating for. As LGBT will exterminate reproduction of human being sit is very harmful for civilization. So the government has acted on John Stuart Mill’s idea that the government can exercise authority only to prevent harm to others. The suave people like you speaking about fundamental human values of respect, tolerance and freedom reminds me of Joseph Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ in which the writer has shown how the proponent of civilization established the rule of terror and exploitation in the dark terrains of Africa. You are very wrong to say that religion is only for Love. ‘I love you’ also includes I hate your enemies. Everything in this world is created in pairs. So brother, don’t please stick to your condescending attitude. We have learnt many things from people like you but we have not yet sold our souls like Dr. Faustus. We are awake and rising form ashes.

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

5 December 2011 - 1:59 pm

Mr. Ebert, this thread reveals an interesting facet of Bangladesh. People like Mr. Subhan and Mr. Qasem are fairly articulate. It would be safe to assume that they have a good amount of education, and have some intellectual impetus. There are thousands like them, professionals who drive the rising middle-class and form the backbone of the intellectual community. They are more than competent at their fields of specialization. But as the posts here show, they are woefully ignorant. They cannot distinguish the fundamental separation of church and state that is embedded in any liberal constitution, including that of Bangladesh.

They cannot realize that religion has no place in legislation if it infringes on the basic civil liberties of individuals. They refuse to critically engage with questions about the role of the state, the value of civil liberties and they justify all their answers through an interpretation of Islam. Hobbes, Mill, Kant, liberalism, the social contract — these words mean nothing to them. That is because they have probably been educated in the sciences, social sciences or business disciplines.

And therein lies the problem. The education in Bangladesh, even under the English medium curriculum, let alone the backdated mess of the Bangla medium curriculum, pays only lip service to the humanities.The drive for economic development and career focused individuals have eroded any sort of respect for the humanities. Unlike colleges in the US, college students in Bangladesh have next to no critical engagement with the liberal arts unless they are in liberal arts majors. Liberal arts degrees do not provide one with the best career prospects and are therefore shunned.

The result is what you see here. It is a sad generation growing up with bigoted values who never questioned the basis of their underlying morality. I would not mind if these fine gentleman personally opposed homosexuality on their own religious grounds. They have every right to do so. But it is men like them that need to be at the forefront of changing social norms, it is men of education who need to critically engage with the role of the state before any sort of change can happen from grassroots level.

I am not LGBT. I am merely someone who is aware of the fact that I cannot accept a state that opposes civil liberties on arbitrary religious grounds. As the gentlemen above pointed out, without destroying homophobia from its roots in people’s minds, there cannot be any meaningful integration. And you cannot achieve this at a meaningful pace if the most intelligent men of the country are completely ignorant of the humanities. This is the point of the liberal arts-to critically engage the mind with ideas that make one uncomfortable and foster intellectual debate. Without it, no reason can succeed. He will go on bashing you on your ‘foreignness’ and insist that liberalism is merely an intrusive instrument of the West without seeing the liberal values that hold together the framework of Bangladesh’s constitution and democracy.

This is an appeal that is long overdue. The educationists in our country need to realize that humanities are fundamental to ensure an informed civic discourse. Without it, you will get men who think gay people should be shot on sight, contractual forced marriages are perfectly okay and legislating from religious interpretations has a role in liberal societies.

The fastest way to affect change is to move to a new educational basis that emphasizes the humanities. Children must read the works of the great thinkers of our time. I believe everyone should read Mill and Kant to get any sort of respect for what liberalism truly means. A case in point would be the gentleman who saw the movie and commented to concede that gay people can also be good people.

Further engagement with the arts will not change their views overnight. But without engaging with literature and philosophy, they will only know the values that their forefathers have taught them and society has reinforced. They will obey it till they die, and pass it on to their children. And the cycle repeats. Never breaks.

  • Comments by Phaedrus

5 December 2011 - 10:40 pm

Mr. Subhan, why would anybody be ashamed to have sex with somebody one loves, regardless of gender? Shame is appropriate only if one has done morally wrong. Homosexuality is a normal and healthy sexual orientation just like heterosexuality. Homosexuality is no more or less a choice than heterosexuality. Sex is an integral part of a happy, healthy, and productive life. To engage in it with other competent and consenting adults is a basic human right. Even though I do not identify as queer myself, I am proudly advocating for the rights of those who do. You talk about homosexuality as being harmful to society because homosexual couples do not reproduce. Tell me: Who is harmed by the fact that a gay couple cannot and, hence, does not reproduce? What about heterosexual couples who choose not to reproduce? Do you believe the government has the moral authority to make it a crime for heterosexual couples not to reproduce (if they were able to)? You are telling people to be ashamed for what they are. You are asking the government to discriminate against people on the basis of their sexual orientation - a fact about them which they did not choose. You are publicly advocating prejudice, discrimination, and violence. Did you ever think about the harm that this kind of prejudice does to society and its queer members? In the United States, between 30% and 40% of LGB youth have attempted suicide at least once. This is about four times more than the number for other young people. Overall, there is a higher prevalence of mental health problems among gay teenagers compared to their heterosexual peers. Please take a few minutes to watch this video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdkNn3Ei-Lg), and see what gay teenagers in the United States are going through. I do not dare to imagine what queer youth in Bangladesh must be going through. Adult queers, too, suffer from the negative attitudes towards them. If they come out, they might face discrimination in their professional as well as private lives, harassment, violence and, in countries like Bangladesh, even criminal prosecution. Prejudices of the kind you advocate are harmful to Bangladeshi queers and your society as a whole. They are no better than the prejudices held by sexists and racists. Shame on you, Mr. Subhan.


5 December 2011 - 11:07 pm

Thank you very much for your thoughtful comment, Phaedrus. We live in a pluralistic and increasingly globalized environment, in which different cultures and traditions, different beliefs and values meet. Critical thinking helps us to keep our minds open in this challenging environment and enables us act thoughtfully. It stands for a strategy that offers us hope in “a world in which prejudices are assumed as premises, and loose reasonings pass current and are unchallenged until they beget some unpalatable conclusion.” (G. S. Fullerton) In a society, in which standards of reason are not held in high esteem, the opinion of the loudest or the most powerful will be unreflectively accepted. The result is a dangerous conformity that is poisonous to a lively democracy. Therefore, one cannot emphasize enough the importance of liberal arts education. Training in critical thinking and philosophy in particular enables students to lead an examined and meaningful life and is essential to the progress of any society. I strongly believe that critical thinking and philosophy should be a part of any school curriculum. Education is the key in the struggle against prejudice and bigotry.


6 December 2011 - 1:30 am

23 years old, living in Dhaka and I am GAY. I am not surprised by Mr. Qashem and Mr. Subhan’s comment, just feeling a bit sad, I’d say I’m feeling lonely, but people like Mr. Himadri and Mr. Phaedrus still exist. They are the ones give me hope. I know they would never outnumber ultra religious-gay bashing mass people, but may be, someday they will make an impact on their mind.

The repeal of section 377 would be the beginning of a new era for the LGBT Bangladesh. Don’t know if that’s ever gonna happen - but I am hopeful. This would give people like me some basic grounds for standing up and fight (against injustice and discrimination).

Thank you Mr. Ebert for your article.

  • Comments by SomeoneAlone

6 December 2011 - 12:59 pm

Mr. Rainer Ebert, I am amazed at your stamina and intellectual height. However, I will find myself successful if my comments put so strong a moral pressure on LGBT sinners that they shun this age-old sin and find sexual solace in opposite sex. But I will find myself more successful if I can turn your attention from ‘genitals’ to other more important human rights abuse perpetrated by the most vocal proponent of human rights. I again assert that most people are LGBT by accident not by Choice. My heart goes to those who are suffering from LGBT related mental health disorder. Actually pangs of consciousness within the souls resulting from LGBT activities are more to blame than the adverse comment and environment for the high attempted suicide rate among the LGBT people in America that you have shown in your comment.

Mr. Phaedrus, I am smarting from a fall from a height you raised me to in you comment. Actually, we are not ignorant of humanities but of evil design of some people who are most happy in keeping us ever ignorant so that they can rule us some more decades. Thank you for your erudite comment. You dropped me but it will not be long when we are at the top of everything.

  • Comments by Abdus Subhan

6 December 2011 - 11:50 pm

Dear SomeoneAlone, I am glad you liked the article. And I need you to know that it will get better! Freedom will ultimately prevail over bigotry and intolerance. It is only a matter of time. I will arrive in Dhaka at the end of this week and plan to do some research for a follow-up article on homosexuality in Bangladesh. I would love to meet you and talk with you about your experiences as a gay man in Bangladesh. I hope you will allow me to invite you for coffee or dinner. Please find my e-mail address at http://www.rainerebert.com/ and send me an e-mail with your phone number. I shall then call you once I am in Dhaka.


2 January 2012 - 6:24 pm

Muhammad Bin Qasem and Abdus Subhan are two individuals with extreme distorted views on homosexuality. Fortunately they do not represent the majority of Bangladeshi population. I am a Bangladeshi homosexual man. My parents and my brother accept me for who I am. All my straight friends to whom I came out accept me for who I am. In fact, I became closer to them after I came out. Yes, I confess that I did not come out to everyone in this country, because not everyone has the mental maturity to accept a new idea.

I am not going into any debate with these two individuals, because from their comments on this blog, I think any attempt of a meaningful debate with them is a waste of my time. I can live my life well without them. The world is moving forward, we don’t have slaves now-a-days, women are enjoying equal rights as men in most parts of the world. One day the homosexual men and women will also enjoy equal rights all over the world. I find Hillary Clinton’s recent speech at the UN summit particularly encouraging given the fact that only a few decades ago homosexuality was a crime in the USA. Check out her speech on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MudnsExyV78&feature=share

Whether Muhammad Bin Qasem and Abdus Subhan approve it or not, homosexuality will be decriminalized in Bangladesh within a few years time and the acceptance in society will increase faster than we think. Bangladesh criminal laws are not based on Sharia law. We do not chop off peoples’ hands for stealing. Bangladeshi law does not approve killing women by stoning for adultery. Section 377 is not based on Sharia law either. Section 377 is a leftover from the British colonial rule. Homosexuality was decriminalised in England in 1967. If the British did not colonise this land or if this land was freed from British after 1967, homosexuality would not be illegal in Bangladesh today.

  • Comments by quazi

2 January 2012 - 7:21 pm

Dear quazi, I would love to meet you and talk with you about your experiences as a gay man in Bangladesh. If you are interested, please find my e-mail address at http://www.rainerebert.com/ and send me an e-mail with your phone number. I will be in Dhaka until Sunday.


7 January 2012 - 11:54 am

Raise your voice and join the struggle against homophobia in Bangladesh… now on Facebook! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bangladesh-Against-Homophobia/230763816998554

For Comment Log in